Promotes equal justice.
|
Promotes social justice.
|
Competition is good.
|
Competition is unfair.
|
Supports lower taxes.
|
Supports progressive taxation
with high taxes for the rich.
|
Less government is better.
Wants only necessary regulation of business, economy, and individual lives,
resulting in more freedom.
|
More government is better.
Many regulations are necessary to achieve a more fair & just society
which is government’s primary role, resulting in less freedom.
|
Limited federal government
with more power given to state and local governments.
|
Powerful centralized federal
government with limited state and local control.
|
People and property rights
are more important than environment. Supports conservation and development
and use of our natural resources along with the development of green
technology by private enterprise and when it is economically feasible and
self-sustaining. Opposes cap and trade due to its high cost and negative
impact on our businesses and way of life.
|
Environment more important
than people and property rights. Supports rationing and limiting access to
natural resources. Focuses on green technology subsidized by the government.
Supports cap and trade.
|
Wealth is good. All have an
opportunity to be wealthy. Creates a better life for all through
entrepreneurship.
|
Wealth is bad and unfair.
Promotes class warfare.
|
Equal opportunity without
discrimination. Same access for all. Recognizes people make different choices
with what they have. Doesn’t seek equal outcomes.
|
Equal results through such
things as quotas and equal pay for unequal work. Have to level the playing
field in order to have equal opportunity. Seeks equal outcomes.
|
Judicial restraint with strict
interpretation of laws according to the Constitution and original intent.
|
Judicial activism: enacting
social policy changes via court rulings. Constitution is seen as outdated and
in need of change.
|
Free market economy. Free
market creates jobs.
|
Government regulation of
economy. Government creates jobs.
|
Business is good: creates
jobs & improves lives. Give freedom for them to do what they do best. Let
free market supply and demand adjust practices. Let employers and employees
negotiate benefits.
|
Business is evil: out to
exploit employees, environment, and consumers. Needs to be regulated to
protect consumers, employees, and the environment. Government regulates
employee benefits.
|
Traditional morality,
including traditional family and values. Absolute standards of right and
wrong. Absolute truth. Sees standing against wrong as a moral duty.
|
Tolerance of all lifestyles
& beliefs except those that hold beliefs they consider to be politically
incorrect like pro-life Christians. No absolute standards of right and wrong.
Moral relativism.
|
Right to free speech must be
supported even if it offends.
|
Right to free speech is
limited to speech that does not offend. (Political correctness)
|
Peace through strength via a
strong military.
|
Peace through appeasement,
cooperation, and understanding others' views. Dislikes showing and exercising
strength.
|
Supports a missile defense
system.
|
Opposes a missile defense
system.
|
American sovereignty comes
before globalism.
|
Globalism comes before
American sovereignty.
|
Sees America as good: the
best hope for the world. Believes in American exceptionalism.
|
Sees America as flawed:
racist, homophobic, imperialistic, sexist, ageist and no better than other
countries.
|
Western cultures are superior
to others without rights, freedom, and respect for life.
|
All cultures are equal. Can’t
pass judgment on any even if they don’t value freedom, rights, and life.
|
God is a necessary part of a
good society. Religion makes people good.
|
State is secular (without
God). Seeks to eliminate all references of God.
|
Rights emphasized: Freedom,
Parental, Property, Religious, Guns, Life.
|
Rights emphasized: Civil,
Privacy, Secularism, and Reproductive.
|
Yoga BURN! for Women
Showing posts with label change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label change. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Conservative vs. Liberal
Labels:
capitalism,
change,
conservative,
Constitution,
Evidence,
Gas,
laser-like-focus,
Obama,
Pelosi,
Tax Cuts
Saturday, July 28, 2012
Those That Can't, Teach
So, if you make a product, the chances are you want to get it in as many stores as possible. If you make a car, you want to get it in as many dealerships as possible. The dealers BUY your cars and SELL them to the people that saw your commercial and are interested in your product. You don't pay the dealers to do this. They work for the difference between what they buy it for and how much they mark it up.
Does everyone pretty much understand this concept?
Now, if you make cars and you want to sell more, you make products that the consumer WANTS. You improve the cars they like, build new and innovative models and discontinue models that they don't want.
Does everyone pretty much understand this concept?
If you want to save a company in trouble, you change what is causing them to go under.
Does everyone pretty much understand this concept?
Knowing these 3 concepts, let's take a look at GM's bailout. GM was forced to cutoff many dealerships that cost them nothing and yet acted as the conduit for getting their cars to consumers. GM was forced to promote an all electric vehicle in markets where there was no real demand. GM was given enough money to pay the unions that were sucking off all the profits. They continued to pay more and more to people that worked a number of years and then retired. In other words, they are paying people to NOT build cars. That number of non-workers has been growing to the point that GM CAN NO LONGER MAKE A PROFIT.
This same genius whose team came up with this plan for saving GM is now seeking a second term while claiming that his policies WORK.
He can ONLY make this claim stick if it was his intention ruin our economy.
Does everyone pretty much understand this concept?
Now, if you make cars and you want to sell more, you make products that the consumer WANTS. You improve the cars they like, build new and innovative models and discontinue models that they don't want.
Does everyone pretty much understand this concept?
If you want to save a company in trouble, you change what is causing them to go under.
Does everyone pretty much understand this concept?
Knowing these 3 concepts, let's take a look at GM's bailout. GM was forced to cutoff many dealerships that cost them nothing and yet acted as the conduit for getting their cars to consumers. GM was forced to promote an all electric vehicle in markets where there was no real demand. GM was given enough money to pay the unions that were sucking off all the profits. They continued to pay more and more to people that worked a number of years and then retired. In other words, they are paying people to NOT build cars. That number of non-workers has been growing to the point that GM CAN NO LONGER MAKE A PROFIT.
This same genius whose team came up with this plan for saving GM is now seeking a second term while claiming that his policies WORK.
He can ONLY make this claim stick if it was his intention ruin our economy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)